We will also be looking at their maximum overclocked performance to help you decide which is the best value option for enthusiasts and PC gamers alike. Today we will put both cards to the test and find out which is faster in a wide range of games using the latest drivers. The GTX 275 uses a 55nm GPU featuring the same amount of SPUs and TAUs as the more powerful GeForce GTX 285, while only as many ROPs as the GeForce GTX 260. The GeForce GTX 275 is also a derivative from an existing product, borrowing its GPU from the GeForce GTX 295, which is a dual-GPU graphics card. ATI has fine-tuned the RV790 XT core allowing for incredible core frequencies. Starting with the Radeon HD 4890, this new card is in essence an overclocked Radeon HD 4870 with far greater overclocking abilities. Gamers looking to spend some $250 on a brand new graphics card were given two new options last month when ATI unleashed their Radeon HD 4890 and Nvidia countered with the GeForce GTX 275. 0.TechSpot compared the ATI Radeon HD 4890 against Nvidia GeForce GTX 275 Should i swap in my GTX or leave the AMD I looked over a few stats, the memory clock seems faster for the GTX, but its gddr3 vs 5 the bandwidth is comparable at 127. #22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s. I have a GeForce GTX 275, and i might be getting a better (CPU mobo and RAM) desktop with a AMD Radeon HD 6850 from a friend. #20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s. #19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s. Tax) Nvidia GeForce GTX 275 896MB Manufacturer. VAT) US Price (as reviewed): Typical price 249.99 (ex. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 275. ATI Radeon HD 4890 1GB Manufacturer: AMD UK Price (as reviewed): Typical price £220 (inc. Its an interesting article, but well have to wait for real Radeon HD 4890 and GeForce GTX 275 reviews to know who will be the winner of the latest graphics battle. Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5730: 155 watts lower power draw. #16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.275s. The GeForce GTX 275 on the other hand is expected to be 30 percent cheaper than the GeForce GTX 285 but performance will be only 8-12 percent less. #13 getting avg benchmarks for device 4606 +0.021s. #9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s. #8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s. #7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s. #6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s. #5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s. #4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s. So betritt gleichzeitig mit der ATi-Karte die GeForce GTX 275 die Bühne, die sich zwischen der GeForce GTX 260 und der GeForce GTX 285 platziert und gleichzeitig die Radeon HD 4890 attackiert. #3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.057s. #2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10:17:52 +0100 +0.001s. #0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s. Questo consente al chip di essere utilizzato in portatili da 12 a 13 pollici o superiori.
L'APU è realizzata in 32nm ed ha un TDP di 25 watts. Gli shaders del chip possono essere usati anche per calcoli generici. Tuttavia, senza la veloce memoria dual-channel le prestazioni calano in modo drammatico. Di conseguenza, la Radeon HD 8610G è veloce quanto una HD 6650M dedicata o una NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M. In base ai clock rates, le prestazioni dovrebbero essere simili alla Radeon HD 7660G o alla Intel HD Graphics 4600. Il video decoder integrato (UVD3) consente la piena decodifica di videos Multi-View Codec (MVC), MPEG-4 Part 2 (DivX, xVid), MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 ed Adobe Flash HD. La 8610G non ha memoria grafica dedicata, ma condivide la memoria principale con i cores CPU. Offre complessivamente 384 shader cores (Architettura VLIW4) ed un clock da 533 - 626 MHz. L'AMD Radeon HD 8610G è una schede grafica integrata nei processori low voltage APUs AMD Richland (A10-5745M).
0 kommentar(er)
